In the following hand, without knowing if partner has a ♣ control or not, how would North explore game in NT or ♠?
EW vulnerable, W is dealer:
North ♠KJT96 ♥974 ♦AJ72 ♣3 |
||
West ♠AQ5 ♥K852 ♦53 ♣QJ98 |
East ♠43 ♥J63 ♦964 ♣96542 |
|
South ♠872 ♥AQT ♦KQT8 ♣AKT |
N | E | S | W |
Pass | |||
Pass | Pass | 1♦ | Double |
1♠ | Pass | 2NT | Pass |
??? |
Heidi's Answer
I wouldn't worry about having the ♣ stopper here -- South is showing a strong hand and they should have the ♣ suit stopped.But North should want to investigate whether or not they have a 5-3 ♠ fit. South could easily have three ♠ and then the partnership has an eight card fit.
How do they ask?
They bid a suit at the 3 level.
North can bid 3♦ IF they KNOW South will bid again. South SHOULD bid again but sometimes Partner passes these forcing bids.
If North is not sure then they can bid 3♣. This is just a FORCING bid -- does NOT show anything in the ♣ suit.
But it does say "Partner I am unblanced. I don't want to play in NT."
Here North should have five ♠. Why else would they be unbalanced?
So South can bid 3♠. They already denied having four ♠ in the auction by bidding 2NT instead of raising ♠. They already guaranteed two ♠ by bidding NT -- they would not bid NT with a singleton ♠. So thisbidding 3♠ now shows three ♠.
North can raise to game in ♠ knowing they have a fit.
Suggested Auction
North ♠KJT96 ♥974 ♦AJ72 ♣3 |
||
West ♠AQ5 ♥K852 ♦53 ♣QJ98 |
East ♠43 ♥J63 ♦964 ♣96542 |
|
South ♠872 ♥AQT ♦KQT8 ♣AKT |
N | E | S | W |
Pass | |||
Pass | Pass | 1♦ | Double |
1♠ | Pass | 2NT | Pass |
3♣ or 3♦ | Pass | 3♠ | Pass |
4♠ | Pass | Pass | Pass |
No comments:
Post a Comment