This post talks about counting losers in a trump contract. If you want some practice on doing that please read this post first:
Counting Losers
The reason why we count losers in a trump contract is to figure out whether or not we will make the contract! If we have 4 losers but are in a 4♠ contract we have one too many losers. We have to figure out how to avoid losing one of those losers.
There are several simple ways to get rid of losers. This post talks about throwing some of our losers away on winners.
Contract:4♥ Opening lead:3♦
Dummy:
♠QJT3
♥Q942
♦AKT8
♣8
Declarer:
♠K52
♥AKJ5
♦QJ952
♣4
First let's count losers. Normally one counts the losers in the hand with the longest trump. That would be either hand since they both have four trump. When this happens I take the hand that has the longest suit outside the trump suit. In this case I will count the losers in Declarer's hand since Declarer has that nice ♦ suit.
How many losers does Declarer have in each of the suits?
There are TWO losers in Declarer's hand. Declarer should have no problem making this contract.
How will Declarer do this?
Since I was Declarer I won the ♦ lead. This ♦ lead looked suspiciously like a singleton so I took out all the Opponents trump. (They split 3-2 by the way. One Opponent had three of them and the other Opponent had two.) Then I played a ♠ to knock out the Opponents A♠. I even remember to play HIGH card from the SHORT SIDE. This set up all my ♠ tricks. When the Opponents were in they also won their A♣ but that was fine. I still make an OVERTRICK in my contract! So I was VERY happy....
UNTIL I looked at my score. My Partner and I got 0% for this result!
How can bidding a game and making an overtrick be so bad?!
Well I checked the results and EVERYONE else took 12 tricks.
Hmmmmm. How do you suppose everyone took 12 tricks? Think about that and I will let you know in the next post.
Monday, February 27, 2017
Saturday, February 25, 2017
Throw Losers on Winners
This post talks about counting losers in a trump contract. If you want some practice on doing that please read this post first:
Counting Losers The reason why we count losers in a trump contract is to figure out whether or not we will make the contract! If we have 4 losers but are in a 4♠ contract we have one too many losers. We have to figure out how to avoid losing one of those losers.
There are several simple ways to get rid of losers. This post talks about throwing some of our losers away on winners.
Contract:4♠ Opening lead:K♥ Dummy: ♠KJ73 ♥862 ♦KQJ8 ♣Q2 Declarer: ♠AQ942 ♥A75 ♦A74 ♣97 First let's count losers. Normally one counts the losers in the hand with the longest trump. That would be Declarer's hand.
How many losers does Declarer have in each of the suits?
There are FOUR losers in Declarer's hand. The problem is that Declarer is only allowed to lose THREE tricks since the contract is 4♠. How will Declarer make this contract? They somehow have to get rid of ONE of their losers. How will Declarer do this? An easy way to get rid of losers in one hand is to throw them away on winners from the other hand. If you check out that ♦ suit you can see that there are four ♦ in Dummy but only three ♦ in Declarer's hand. PLUS the ♦ are all winners. So when Declarer is playing the ♦ from Dummy and runs out of ♦ to play in their hand they are allowed to play another suit. This is where Declarer can throw away one of their losers. So Declarer should start with the A♦ from their hand (high card from the short side) and then a low ♦ towards the K♦ in Dummy. Then Declarer can play the Q♦ from Dummy and their LAST ♦ from their hand. Declarer can now play the J♦ from Dummy and (since that will win the trick) throw away a losing card from their hand. Doesn't really matter what loser they throw away -- either a ♥ loser or a ♣ loser will do. But Declarer should now make their contract. Can they do this right away? Should they win the K♥ with their A♥ and then play the ♦? No! Declarer has not yet taken out the Opponents trump! The Opponents will be able to trump ♦ before Declarer gets rid of their loser! Declarer needs to take out the Opponents trump first! So the steps in order are: Step 1: Win the Opponents K♥ with the A♥ Step 2: Take out ALL the Opponents trump. Even if one of them holds ALL FOUR TRUMP. (They sometimes do!) Step 3: Play the ♦ suit HIGH CARD from the SHORT SIDE ending in Dummy Step 4: Throw away a loser from their hand Step 5: Rejoice in a contract well played
Counting Losers The reason why we count losers in a trump contract is to figure out whether or not we will make the contract! If we have 4 losers but are in a 4♠ contract we have one too many losers. We have to figure out how to avoid losing one of those losers.
There are several simple ways to get rid of losers. This post talks about throwing some of our losers away on winners.
Contract:4♠ Opening lead:K♥ Dummy: ♠KJ73 ♥862 ♦KQJ8 ♣Q2 Declarer: ♠AQ942 ♥A75 ♦A74 ♣97 First let's count losers. Normally one counts the losers in the hand with the longest trump. That would be Declarer's hand.
How many losers does Declarer have in each of the suits?
There are FOUR losers in Declarer's hand. The problem is that Declarer is only allowed to lose THREE tricks since the contract is 4♠. How will Declarer make this contract? They somehow have to get rid of ONE of their losers. How will Declarer do this? An easy way to get rid of losers in one hand is to throw them away on winners from the other hand. If you check out that ♦ suit you can see that there are four ♦ in Dummy but only three ♦ in Declarer's hand. PLUS the ♦ are all winners. So when Declarer is playing the ♦ from Dummy and runs out of ♦ to play in their hand they are allowed to play another suit. This is where Declarer can throw away one of their losers. So Declarer should start with the A♦ from their hand (high card from the short side) and then a low ♦ towards the K♦ in Dummy. Then Declarer can play the Q♦ from Dummy and their LAST ♦ from their hand. Declarer can now play the J♦ from Dummy and (since that will win the trick) throw away a losing card from their hand. Doesn't really matter what loser they throw away -- either a ♥ loser or a ♣ loser will do. But Declarer should now make their contract. Can they do this right away? Should they win the K♥ with their A♥ and then play the ♦? No! Declarer has not yet taken out the Opponents trump! The Opponents will be able to trump ♦ before Declarer gets rid of their loser! Declarer needs to take out the Opponents trump first! So the steps in order are: Step 1: Win the Opponents K♥ with the A♥ Step 2: Take out ALL the Opponents trump. Even if one of them holds ALL FOUR TRUMP. (They sometimes do!) Step 3: Play the ♦ suit HIGH CARD from the SHORT SIDE ending in Dummy Step 4: Throw away a loser from their hand Step 5: Rejoice in a contract well played
Monday, February 13, 2017
Killer Lead
WARNING! The following post talks about Jacoby Transfers. If you do not know what they are then do NOT bother reading this post.
Here is a hand from a few days ago where I was an Opponent. You are now my Partner who has to make a killing lead against a game contract.
The previous post discussed the bidding. Check out this post first:
Was the Bidding Correct?
So, to get the bidding from your perspective, here's what happened from your point of view.
Your RHO opens the bidding 1NT. ("15 to 17" their Partner announced.) You Pass. Your LHO bid 2♦. ("Transfer" your RHO announces.) Your Partner Passes. 2♥ your RHO bid. You Pass. 2NT bid LHO. Partner Passes. 3♥ RHO bid. You Pass. 4♥ LHO bid. This ended the auction.
Here's a recap:
The last post talked about what was wrong with the bidding. LHO has somehow misbid. You don't know WHAT the misbid was. Maybe they bid 2NT with more points than they should and are now making up for it. Maybe they are now overbidding their hand with the 4♥ bid. You don't know. But you do have to make a lead. What will you lead from this holding?
Your hand:
♠AJ9
♥765
♦Q73
♣K985
Show Answer
RHO | You! | RHO | Partner |
1NT (15-17) | Pass | 2♦ (Transfer) | Pass |
2♥ | Pass | 2NT | Pass |
3♥ | Pass | 4♥ | Pass |
Pass | Pass |
My Partner made a very good lead. He lead trump!
Many players don't realize you CAN actually lead trump. Sometimes it IS a good lead.
Why did he lead trump? Basically he didn't want to lead ANY OTHER SUIT.
He didn't want to lead a ♠ with the AJ9. Too easy to give up a trick.
He didn't want to lead a ♦ to help Declarer find the Q♦.
He didn't want to lead a ♣ with the K985. Too easy to give up a trick there also.
So he eliminated all the suits he did NOT want to lead from and came up with only one suit he didn't mind leading from. The trump suit.
Here are the four hands.
If you lead a ♣ you help Declarer set up the ♣ suit for winners.
If you lead a ♦ you finessed your own Q♦.
If you lead a ♠ Declarer can now eventually trump a ♠ in his hand to establish a tenth trick for himself no matter what you do next.
Sometimes making a good lead means just not making a bad lead.
Dummy♠532♥AKJT4♦T942 ♣6 |
||
You!♠AJ9 ♥765♦Q73 ♣K985 |
Me!♠KQ764♥98♦865 ♣Q72 |
|
Declarer♠T8♥Q32♦AKJ ♣AJT43 |
Sunday, February 12, 2017
Was the Bidding Correct?
WARNING! The following post talks about Jacoby Transfers. If you do not know what they are then do NOT bother reading this post.
Here is a hand from a few days ago where I was an Opponent.
Your LHO opens the bidding 1NT. ("15 to 17" their Partner announced.) Partner Passes. My RHO bid 2♦. ("Transfer" my LHO announced.) I Passed. 2♥ my LHO bid. Partner Passes. 2NT bid RHO. I Pass. 3♥ my LHO bid. Partner Passes. 4♥ my RHO bid. This ended the auction.
Here's a recap:
The question is WHAT (if anything) is wrong with the bidding?
Show Answer
LHO | Partner | RHO | Me! |
1NT (15-17) | Pass | 2♦ (Transfer) | Pass |
2♥ | Pass | 2NT | Pass |
3♥ | Pass | 4♥ | Pass |
Pass | Pass |
4♥ is a NON-BID. That means that RHO CANNOT bid 4♥ on this auction if their original 2NT was correct.
2NT showed an invitational hand -- about 8 or 9 points. This is a bid their Partner is allowed to Pass. My RHO should not have enough points to force to game.
But the 2♦ Transfer bid showed that they have a five card ♥ suit. So over the 2NT, LHO bid 3♥. They know they have a ♥ fit BUT if LHO wanted to accept the invite they would have bid 4♥ themselves. They are minimum. But they do have a fit so they should make sure they play in the ♥ fit. However Partner is supposed to PASS this bid.
Partner didn't. Partner misbid. It happens.
Next post you will have to make the killer opening lead. If you make the wrong lead Declarer can make the game.
Wednesday, February 8, 2017
1NT: NON-Forcing, Invitational or Forcing?
Let's play a game. The name of the game is "Over 1NT: Non-Forcing, Invitational or Forcing?"
I will give you a bid and you have to tell me whether or not it is a Non-Forcing bid (Partner must Pass the bid), an Invitational bid (Partner should bid if they are maximum for their 1NT opener but Pass if they are minimum) or a Forcing bid (Partner MUST bid again)
This post is easy enough that brand new players should be able to answer all the questions. However, for my more advanced students, I talk about Jacoby Transfers and also Texas. If you do not know what those bids are just ignore the stuff in brackets. You do not need to know what they are.
Bid 1
Is Responder’s bid of 2NT a Non-Forcing bid, an Invitational bid or a Forcing bid?
Bid 2
Is Responder’s bid of 6NT a Non-Forcing bid, an Invitational bid or a Forcing bid?
Bid 3
Is Responder’s bid of 2♥ a Non-Forcing bid, an Invitational bid or a Forcing bid?
Bid 4
Is Responder’s bid of 5NT a Non-Forcing bid, an Invitational bid or a Forcing bid?
Bid 5
Is Responder’s bid of 4NT a Non-Forcing bid, an Invitational bid or a Forcing bid?
Bid 6
Is Responder’s bid of 2♦ a Non-Forcing bid, an Invitational bid or a Forcing bid?
Bid 7
Is Responder’s bid of 3♥ a Non-Forcing bid, an Invitational bid or a Forcing bid?
Bid 8
Is Responder’s bid of 4♥ a Non-Forcing bid, an Invitational bid or a Forcing bid?
Bid 9
Is Responder’s bid of 2♠ a Non-Forcing bid, an Invitational bid or a Forcing bid?
Bid 10
Is Responder’s bid of 3NT a Non-Forcing bid, an Invitational bid or a Forcing bid?
Opener | Responder |
1NT | 2NT |
Opener | Responder |
1NT | 6NT |
Opener | Responder |
1NT | 2♥ |
Opener | Responder |
1NT | 5NT |
Opener | Responder |
1NT | 4NT |
Opener | Responder |
1NT | 2♦ |
Opener | Responder |
1NT | 3♥ |
Opener | Responder |
1NT | 4♥ |
Opener | Responder |
1NT | 2♠ |
Opener | Responder |
1NT | 3NT |
Tuesday, February 7, 2017
Pre-empt from Today
WARNING! The following post talks about Pre-emptive Bidding. Pre-empts are bids used by more experienced players. If you are a new player do NOT bother reading this post. When you have played a bit more and know a bit more you can learn how to use them. For now, do not bother.
Here is a hand from today.
The Opponents are vulnerable.
You and Partner are non-vulnerable.
Your Partner opens the bidding 2♠. RHO Passes. Your bid. What is your call?
♠Q863
♥T
♦QJT763
♣J8
So it is your bid. What will you do?
Show Answer
If you bid 4♠ you get a good board.
Why you ask? How can you possible make 4♠? Partner is weak and you have nothing? How can this be good?
Well Partner does have a weak hand. They have:
♠AKJT94
♥J84
♦94
♣T5
4♠ goes down 2. Partner has no play.
So why is this good? Let's take a look at what happens if you PASS 2♠. After all 2♠ should make if 4♠ goes down 2.
True. 2♠ will make. However the Opponents will NOT allow you to play in 2♠. They will bid. And they will bid 4♥.
Can you defeat 4♥? No. You have no defence. You can't even defeat 6♥. They will take 12 tricks if ♥ is trump.
This is easy for the Opponents to figure out when you pass 2♠.
MUCH more difficult to figure out if you bid 4♠.
Most Opponents will let you play in 4♠ and be happy they defeated you two tricks. They will leave oblivious to the fact that they missed their ♥ slam.
I set this up as a little test. I was watching my students bid. My one student bid 4♠ with such confidence I actually thought they were going to make it even though I knew they couldn't. Good job for them! Next time you get a hand like that bid game with confidence. The Opponents just might not find their game!
Check out this post to learn how to UP the PRE-EMPT:
Pre-emptive Bidding -- Upping the Pre-empt
Thursday, February 2, 2017
Even MORE Non-Forcing, One Round Forcing or Game Forcing?
Let's play a game. The name of the game is "Non-Forcing, One Round Forcing or Game Forcing?"
I will give you a bid and you have to tell me whether or not it is a Non-Forcing bid (Partner is allowed to Pass the bid), a One Round Forcing bid (Partner must respond at least one more time) or a Game Forcing bid (neither Partner can Pass until a game is reached)
Bid 1
Is Opener’s bid of 2♠ a Non-Forcing bid, a One Round Forcing bid or a Game Forcing bid?
Bid 2
Is Opener’s bid of 3♣ a Non-Forcing bid, a One Round Forcing bid or a Game Forcing bid?
Bid 3
Is Responder’s bid of 3♣ a Non-Forcing bid, a One Round Forcing bid or a Game Forcing bid?
Bid 4
Is Opener’s bid of 3♥ a Non-Forcing bid, a One Round Forcing bid or a Game Forcing bid?
Bid 5
Is Opener’s bid of 3♥ a Non-Forcing bid, a One Round Forcing bid or a Game Forcing bid?
Bid 6
Is Opener’s bid of 2NT a Non-Forcing bid, a One Round Forcing bid or a Game Forcing bid?
Bid 7
Is Responder’s bid of 3♠ a Non-Forcing bid, a One Round Forcing bid or a Game Forcing bid?
Bid 8
Is Opener’s bid of 2NT a Non-Forcing bid, a One Round Forcing bid or a Game Forcing bid?
Bid 9
Is Opener’s bid of 2NT a Non-Forcing bid, a One Round Forcing bid or a Game Forcing bid?
Bid 10
Is Responder’s bid of 2♠ a Non-Forcing bid, a One Round Forcing bid or a Game Forcing bid?
Opener | Responder |
1♦ | 1♥ |
2♠ |
Opener | Responder |
1♥ | 2♣ |
3♣ |
Opener | Responder |
1♣ | 1♥ |
2♦ | 3♣ |
Opener | Responder |
1♥ | 1♠ |
3♥ |
Opener | Responder |
1♥ | 2♣ |
3♥ |
Opener | Responder |
1♥ | 2♦ |
2NT |
Opener | Responder |
1♠ | 2♦ |
2♥ | 3♠ |
Opener | Responder |
1♦ | 1♥ |
2NT |
Opener | Responder |
1♦ | 1NT |
2NT |
Opener | Responder |
1♦ | 1♥ |
2♦ | 2♠ |
Wednesday, February 1, 2017
Pre-emptive Bids -- A Summary
WARNING! The following post talks about Pre-emptive Bidding. Pre-empts are bids used by more experienced players. If you are a new player do NOT bother reading this post. When you have played a bit more and know a bit more you can learn how to use them. For now, do not bother.
This post summarizes all the following posts:
Pre-emptive Bidding -- An Introduction
Responding to a Weak 2
Weak 2 Bids -- Responding to 2NT
Pre-emptive Bidding -- Does Vulnerabilitity Matter?
Pre-emptive Bidding -- Upping the Pre-empt
A pre-emptive bid occurs when one player JUMPS in the bidding to bid a suit and their partner has not yet made a bid.
You can pre-empt when you open the bidding.
You can also make a pre-emptive overcall.
The purpose of a pre-emptive bid is to disrupt the opponents bidding. It shows a weak hand with a good quality, long suit.
To make a pre-emptive bid you should have the following:
♠ 8543
♥ T9
♦ K82
♣ KT64
Hand 2
♠ QT74
♥ AT32
♦ 7
♣ A654
Hand 3
♠ QJ65
♥ AQ4
♦ AQ3
♣ A87
Hand 4
♠ T94
♥ KT7
♦ T2
♣ A9742
Hand 5
♠ JT9
♥ AJ76
♦ J872
♣ 42
Hand 6
♠ K743
♥ 82
♦ A3
♣ KT876
Hand 7
♠ A976
♥ A82
♦ AQJT97
♣
Hand 8
♠ 953
♥ AJ
♦ AT9654
♣ 83
Hand 9
♠ QT43
♥ A6
♦ 3
♣ KT8765
Hand 10
♠ K87
♥ A54
♦ A54
♣ A765
Hand 11
♠
♥ KQ65
♦ KQ765
♣ KQ54
Hand 12
♠ J97
♥ 3
♦ AJ983
♣ KJ94
Hand 13
♠ A32
♥ T9
♦ K72
♣ Q9765
Hand 14
♠ KT9
♥ A7632
♦ 642
♣ J7
Hand 15
♠ J6
♥ AJT
♦ AT96
♣ KJ76
Hand 16
♠ J653
♥ J875
♦
♣ AK753
Hand 17
♠ KT72
♥ A53
♦ 6
♣ QJ852
Hand 18
♠ 742
♥ KT98
♦ 98
♣ K876
Hand 19
♠ K543
♥ AK7654
♦ 43
♣ 2
Hand 20
♠ Q875
♥ 876
♦ J9
♣ JT76
Hand 21
♠ AQ4
♥ T873
♦ 8652
♣ J4
Hand 22
♠ AQ65
♥ A732
♦ T52
♣ 62
Hand 23
♠ T43
♥ KJ5
♦ K87543
♣ J
Hand 24
♠ K876
♥ 7
♦ AK6
♣ KQ765
Hand 25
♠ K86
♥ J853
♦ 43
♣ KQJ9
Hand 26
♠ 98
♥ AQ4
♦ AQ42
♣ KT65
Hand 27
♠ K765
♥ J4
♦ 2
♣ QJT832
Hand 28
♠ QJ93
♥ 97
♦ AK873
♣ T2
Hand 29
♠ Q94
♥ 5
♦ KQT65
♣ QJ74
Hand 30
♠ Q
♥ AK43
♦ A754
♣ AK32
Hand 31
♠ A976
♥ A
♦
♣ AQJT9765
Hand 32
♠ Q73
♥ JT94
♦ 32
♣ AQ96
Hand 33
♠ 8653
♥ 8
♦ 64
♣ KQJ874
Hand 34
♠ T83
♥ 87
♦ 8753
♣ AKT5
Hand 35
♠ J432
♥ 6532
♦ 84
♣ AJ8
Hand 36
♠ Q4
♥ KQ652
♦ Q54
♣ Q43
- 5 to 10 HCP (or you can play 6 to 11 HCP or even 5 to 11)
- At least 3 of the top 5 honors (A, K, Q, J, T) – non-vulnerable
- At least 2 of the top 3 honors (A, K, Q) - vulnerable or non-vulnerable
- No tolerance for any outside major suit (4+ cards) – your hand is too good
- No outside 5 card minor – your hand is too good
- At most 1 trick outside the suit
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)